A complex, smart mystery filled with intrigue, drama, and more than a little danger awaits in Stephen L. Carter's
engaging debut novel, The Emperor of Ocean Park. After the funeral of his powerful father (a federal judge whose nomination
to the U.S. Supreme Court became a public scandal), Talcott Garland, an African American law professor at an Ivy League university,
is left to unravel the meaning of a cryptic note and carry out "the arrangements" his father left behind. Armed with fortitude
and familial devotion--though paranoid of his wife's fidelity--Talcott soon finds himself in an investigation that entangles
him with a number of questionable Washington, D.C., denizens, including attorneys and government officials, law professors,
the FBI, shady underworld figures, chess masters, and friends and family. All the while Talcott tries not to hurt his attorney
wife's chance for a judicial nomination--and their fragile marriage--but the closer he comes to unraveling his father's dark
secrets, the more dangerous things become.
Clocking in at over 650 pages, the novel could easily have been streamlined; many of Talcott's thoughts are
unnecessarily repeated. But Carter's storytelling skills are adept: tension builds, surprises are genuine, clues are not handed
out freely. The prose, while somewhat meandering, can be crisp and insightful, as demonstrated in Carter's description of
the misguided paths of young attorneys who sacrifice all on the altar of career... at last arriving... at their cherished
career goals, partnerships, professorships, judgeships, whatever kind of ships they dream of sailing, and then looking around
at the angry, empty waters and realizing that they have arrived with nothing, absolutely nothing, and wondering what to do
with the rest of their wretched lives.
- How does The Emperor of Ocean Park differ from more conventional mysteries? In what ways is the narrator,
Talcott Garland, unlike his counterparts--men like Philip Marlow, Sam Spade, and their descendants--in the prototypical mystery?
- How does Carter build and sustain suspense throughout the novel? What are the several mysteries Talcott Garland
is trying to solve? What discoveries does he make--about his father, his wife, his brother, Jack Ziegler, Justice Wainwright,
and others--over the course of the novel? What effect do these discoveries have on him?
- The issue of race appears, in one form or another, throughout The Emperor of Ocean Park. What is Talcott's
attitude toward race? In what instances is he subject to racial stereotyping? What observations does he make about the white
liberal racism he encounters on campus? What racial hypocrisies does he see in his fellow blacks?
- At the Judge's funeral, Aunt Alma cryptically tells Tal that he has "the chance to make everything right.
You can fix it. . . . But your daddy will let you know what to do when the time comes" [p. 24]. Like Hamlet, Talcott is charged
by his father, beyond the grave, to set things right. In what other ways is Talcott a Hamlet-like character? In what ways
must he both fulfill and transcend his father's demands?
- What makes Jack Ziegler such a frightening character? In what ways is he more than merely a villain? In what
sense is he, as Talcott says of him, the "author" of the Garland family's misery?
- His cousin Sally tells Tal: "You think you're so different from Uncle Oliver, but you're just like him. In
some good ways, sure, but in some of the worst ways, too. You look down your nose at people you think are your moral inferiors.
People like your brother. People like me" [p. 270]. Is she right? In what other ways is Tal like his father? How is he different
- What role do the chess problems play in the novel? How do they lead Talcott to uncover his father's "arrangements"?
How are they related to issues of race and power? In what sense is Talcott himself a pawn?
- When a man calls his house asking for his wife, Tal thinks: "Odd the way the immediate concerns about a dying
marriage can knock worries about torture and murder and mysterious chess pieces right out of the box, but priorities are funny
that way" [p. 453]. In what ways is the story of Tal and Kimmer's failing marriage--and the larger story of the complex
relations in the Garland family--more important than the murder mystery? How are his marital problems related to the mystery
he is trying to solve?
- The Emperor of Ocean Park describes a social milieu rarely seen in American fiction: the black middle
class. What does the novel tell us about the highly successful people who make up this class? How are they different from
African Americans more commonly encountered in modern and contemporary fiction?
- Late in the novel, "a wave of fatalism" sweeps over Tal and he wonders "whether I could have done anything
differently, or if, once the Judge died, setting his awful plan in motion, and Jack Ziegler showed up demanding to know the
arrangements, everything else was fixed. Whether my marriage, even, was doomed from the day of the funeral" [p. 533]. Is the
story fated to end as it does or could Talcott have changed its outcome? What might he have done differently?
- The Emperor of Ocean Park is not merely a thriller, but also an extended critique of American culture,
commenting on issues of family, religion, law, education, race, marriage, wealth, and politics. What do the frequent philosophical
digressions add to the novel? What beliefs and values does Talcott Garland try to live by?
- During a dinner-table argument, Dr. Young asserts that Satan "always attacks us in the same ways. . . . He
attacks us with sexual desire and other temptations that distract the body. He attacks us with drink and drugs and other temptations
that addle the brain. He attacks us with racial hatred and love of money and other temptations that distort the soul" [p.
346]. How does this perspective illuminate the behavior of the major characters in novel? Who gives in to the temptations
that Dr. Young describes in this speech? Who resists them?
- How do Tal's relationships with his family--with his father, his sister, his brother, his wife, and his son--change
over the course of the novel?
- When Talcott retells the story of how he and his future wife had gotten out of the Burial Ground by crawling
through a drainage tunnel, he writes: "Some metaphors need no interpretation" [p. 515]. Is the meaning of this metaphor obvious?
How should the escape from the cemetery be interpreted? How is the Burial Ground itself important to the novel's plot?
- As the Judge's secret life is revealed, Dana Worth, a woman who had always admired Oliver Garland, tells
Talcott: "I don't want to say he was evil . . . but he wasn't just deluded, either" [p. 615]. How should the Judge finally
be judged? What drove him to do what he did? Are his actions understandable? Forgivable?
- When he delivers the eulogy at Theo Mountain's funeral, Talcott breaks down weeping. "I suppose people think
I was crying over Theo. Maybe I was, a little. But, mainly, I was crying over all the good things that will never be again,
and the way the Lord, when you least expect it, forces you to grow up" [p. 620]. What are the "good things" Talcott mourns
the loss of here? In what ways has the Lord forced him to "grow up"? How have the events of the novel changed him?
Discussion questions provided courtesy of Knopf.